Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BEZVULYAK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 12795/14;15308/14;33598/17 • ECHR ID: 001-181637

Document date: February 15, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

BEZVULYAK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 12795/14;15308/14;33598/17 • ECHR ID: 001-181637

Document date: February 15, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 12795/14 Ivan Ivanovich BEZVULYAK against Ukraine and 2 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 15 February 2018 as a Committee composed of:

André Potocki, President, Síofra O ’ Leary, Mārtiņš Mits, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by some of the applicants,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants and the relevant details of the application s are set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) . In application no. 33598/17 the applicant also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

A. Joinder of the applications

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

B. Complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention ( excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law )

The Court, having examined all the materials submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, considers that the applicants ’ complaints under this head are inadmissible since the length of the proceedings was not excessive or unreasonable (see, Yuryeva and Yuryev v. Ukraine , no. 3431/03, § 43, 31 July 2012).

Furthermore, in application no. 12795/14 the proceedings in the applicant ’ s case were finalised by the decision of the High Administrative Court of Ukraine of 23 November 2010. In June 2014 the applicant sought review of this decision by the Supreme Court of Ukraine under the changes introduced to the Administrative Justice Code of Ukraine on 14 March 2014. On 10 June 2014 the Supreme Court of Ukraine rejected the applicant ’ s request stating that the court decisions adopted before 14 March 2014 were not subject to review. Consequently, the request for review lodged by the applicant in the present case could not be considered as a part of an ordinary procedure of examination of his claim. The Court therefore considers that application no. 12795/14 was introduced out of time.

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention.

C. Remaining complaints

The applicant in application no. 33598/17 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

The Cou rt has examined the application a nd considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the application s inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 8 March 2018 .

Liv Tigerstedt André Potocki Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention

(excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Start of proceedings

End of proceedings

Total length

Levels of jurisdiction

12795/14

03/02/2014

Ivan Ivanovich Bezvulyak

27/06/1961

09/02/2007

23/11/2010

3 years, 9 months and 15 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

15308/14

24/03/2014

Oleksandr Ivanovych Shtepa

04/04/1951

26/03/2008

30/01/2012

19/07/2011

03/02/2014

3 years, 3 months and 24 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

2 years and 5 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

33598/17

26/04/2017

Dmytro Stepanovych Babidorych

09/10/1936

22/07/2009

05/02/2015

5 years, 6 months and 15 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846