Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

OVCHINNIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 45430/16;65844/16;26227/17 • ECHR ID: 001-182475

Document date: March 22, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

OVCHINNIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 45430/16;65844/16;26227/17 • ECHR ID: 001-182475

Document date: March 22, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 45430/16 Konstantin Sergeyevich OVCHINNIKOV against Russia and 2 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 22 March 2018 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of pre-trial detention of the applicants. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties, insofar as they cover the issues listed in the unilateral declarations.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list, insofar as they concerned the complaints covered by the Government ’ s unilateral declarations .

The applicant in application no. 65844/16 also raised another complaint under Article 3 of the Convention.

The Court has examined the complaint and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, this complaint does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention, in the part concerning the complaints covered by the Government ’ s unilateral declarations;

Declares the remainder of application no. 65844/16 inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 12 April 2018.

             Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Representative name and location

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [i]

45430/16

27/07/2016

Konstantin Sergeyevich Ovchinnikov

10/08/1989

04/05/2017

01/08/2017

8,125

65844/16

09/11/2016

Artem Aleksandrovich Fedorov

23/10/1981

04/05/2017

27/07/2017

8,375

26227/17

21/03/2017

Maksim Yuryevich Aristarkhov

11/04/1986

Golub Olga Viktorovna

Suzemka

18/09/2017

31/10/2017

5,625

[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846