Search
document

ARIK AND ERGÜN v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 4808/10;4812/10;4813/10;5027/10;5032/10;5038/10;5041/10;5044/10;5047/10;5053/10;5055/10;5059/10 • ECHR ID: 001-183884

Document date: May 15, 2018

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

ARIK AND ERGÜN v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 4808/10;4812/10;4813/10;5027/10;5032/10;5038/10;5041/10;5044/10;5047/10;5053/10;5055/10;5059/10 • ECHR ID: 001-183884

Document date: May 15, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 4808/10 Åžerif ARIK against Turkey and 11 other applications

( see appended list )

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 15 May 2018 as a Committee composed of:

Ledi Bianku , President, Nebojša Vučinić , Jon Fridrik Kjølbro , judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on 5 January 2010,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicants, whose details are set out in the appendix, are Turkish nationals. They were represented before the Court by Mr Nihat Doğan , a lawyer practicing in Şanlıurfa .

The applicants ’ complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention was communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent.

By letter dated 19 December 2017, sent by registered post, the applicants ’ representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of their claims for just satisfaction had expired on 12 May 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants ’ representative ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant ’ s representative received this letter on 29 December 2017. However, no response has been received to date.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 7 June 2018 .

Hasan Bakırcı Ledi Bianku Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

4808/10

Åžerif ARIK

1/01/1956

Şanlıurfa

4812/10

Geylani ARIK

1/01/1959

Şanlıurfa

4813/10

Nasan ERGÃœN

1/01/1943

Åžanliurfa

5027/10

Şükrü ARIK

1/01/1939

Gaziantep

5032/10

Abdülgani ARIK

1/01/1942

Şanlıurfa

5038/10

Zeliha ERGÃœN

1/01/1943

Şanlıurfa

5041/10

Halil ERGÃœN

Şanlıurfa

5044/10

Abdülaziz ARIK

1/01/1927

Şanlıurfa

5047/10

Mustafa ERGÃœN

1/01/1952

Şanlıurfa

5053/10

Ä°brahim ARIK

1/01/1946

Şanlıurfa

5055/10

Veli ARIK

1/01/1950

Şanlıurfa

5059/10

Sabri ERGÃœN

1/01/1932

Şanlıurfa

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant