Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 61464/15;55985/16;17243/17;28671/17;33080/17;42095/17;42231/17;42417/17;45986/17 • ECHR ID: 001-185240

Document date: July 5, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 61464/15;55985/16;17243/17;28671/17;33080/17;42095/17;42231/17;42417/17;45986/17 • ECHR ID: 001-185240

Document date: July 5, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 61464/15 Nikita Nikolayevich SOKOLOV against Russia and 8 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 5 July 2018 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case s .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the application s out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 26 July 2018 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

( inadequate conditions of detention)

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Representative name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [i]

61464/15

03/12/2015

Nikita Nikolayevich Sokolov

15/05/1977

Semenov Maksim Vladimirovich

St Petersburg

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - inadequate conditions of transport and detention in convoy cells on dates of hearings, starting from the date of the arrest and throughout the criminal proceedings;

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - detention of the applicant during court hearings in a metal cage throughout the criminal proceedings against him both before the Smolnichkiy District Court in St Petersburg and Oktyabrskiy District Court;

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - detention order of 01/07/2015, 08/07/2015 and 30/09/2015 examined on 08/09/2015, 16/09/2015 and 25/11/2015, respectively; detention order of 30/12/2015 upheld on appeal on 03/02/2016; detention order of 04/02/2016 examined on appeal on 01/03/2016; detention order of 03/03/2016 examined on 12/04/2016;

Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - detention without sufficient reasoning for a long period of time on a non-violent charge and without due consideration of alternative measures of restraint.

16/01/2018

23/03/2018

8,000

55985/16

13/09/2016

Anatoliy Sergeyevich Sinyavin

05/07/1993

Budkevich Tatyana Georgiyevna

Pervouralsk

01/02/2018

04/04/2018

4,285

17243/17

30/05/2017

Viktor Vasilyevich Andreyev

23/02/1990

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

01/02/2018

09/04/2018

3,555

28671/17

18/04/2017

Marlen Gennadyevich Abroliani

24/11/1979

Magomedova Roza Saidovna

Moscow

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;

Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention. Lengthy pre-trial detention (between 08/10/2015 and 27/04/2017);

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - Lengthy review of pre-trial detention order issued on 26/10/2016 (49 days).

16/01/2018

12/03/2018

7,500

33080/17

05/06/2017

Aleksandr Mikhaylovich Sidorov

08/02/1993

13/02/2018

09/04/2018

5,500

42095/17

24/05/2017

Vyacheslav Valentinovich Finogenov

25/04/1968

Stasyuk Olga Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

16/01/2018

20/04/2018

8,500

42231/17

24/05/2017

Salumatsho Tolibovich Khushunov

09/07/1983

16/01/2018

08/03/2018

11,500

42417/17

28/07/2017

Yevgeniy Stanislavovich Chikishev

13/08/1988

01/02/2018

15/03/2018

2,460

45986/17

13/06/2017

Aleksey Aleksandrovich Zakamaldin

08/08/1988

16/01/2018

04/04/2018

6,000

[i] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255