Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KARGAPOLTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 35461/17, 51611/17, 69515/17, 69518/17, 70287/17, 73346/17, 77242/17, 77252/17, 77258/17, 78234/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-191755

Document date: February 14, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

KARGAPOLTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 35461/17, 51611/17, 69515/17, 69518/17, 70287/17, 73346/17, 77242/17, 77252/17, 77258/17, 78234/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-191755

Document date: February 14, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

19THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 35461/17 Igor Aleksandrovich KARGAPOLTSEV against Russia and 19 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14 February 2019 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case s .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list insofar as they were covered by the unilateral declarations .

The applicant in application no. 4912/18 also raised a complaint about another period of detention, not covered by the unilateral declaration.

The Court has examined the application and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, that complaint either does not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of application no. 4912/18 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the application s out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention insofar as covered by the unilateral declarations of the Government which were accepted by the applicants;

Declares the remainder of application no. 4912/18 inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 7 March 2019 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

35461/17

18/08/2017

Igor Aleksandrovich Kargapoltsev

20/01/1989

15/05/2018

16/07/2018

4,650

51611/17

20/09/2017

Anton Yuryevich Stekolnikov

20/07/1992

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

25/05/2018

10/09/2018

2,460

69515/17

13/12/2017

Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Makhanev

06/06/1978

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/07/2018

22/10/2018

3,920

69518/17

22/01/2018

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich

Drozdov

24/04/1988

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

18/09/2018

27/11/2018

2,450

70287/17

25/10/2017

Aleksey Valentinovich

Vasilyev

08/12/1976

16/07/2018

29/10/2018

4,285

73346/17

17/11/2017

Andrey Sergeyevich

Pakholkov

31/01/1982

16/07/2018

04/10/2018

6,250

77242/17

11/01/2018

Sergey Vladimirovich

Kotov

19/07/1979

18/09/2018

27/11/2018

3,555

77252/17

07/02/2018

Vladimir Nikolayevich

Zhukov

30/09/1988

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

18/09/2018

27/11/2018

6,250

77258/17

22/02/2018

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Ratnikov

17/09/1969

18/09/2018

26/11/2018

6,250

78234/17

30/10/2017

Kristian Olegovich

Karabeynikov

27/10/1996

Stepanov Aleksey Sergeyevich

Moscow

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention –

20/06/2018

17/08/2018

4,285

78522/17

30/10/2017

Dmitriy Andreyevich

Smirnov

08/03/1988

Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/06/2018

24/08/2018

6,500

78536/17

04/11/2017

Dmitriy Anatolyevich

Koryakin

28/08/1977

Orlov Andrey Stanislavovich

St Petersburg

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Moscow District Court of St Petersburg on 03/05/2017

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

15/05/2018

03/08/2018

7,000

79411/17

26/10/2017

Dmitriy Petrovich

Valovenko

25/03/1984

Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/06/2018

10/08/2018

8,500

80514/17

08/11/2017

Yevgeniy Sergeyevich

Pelevin

07/04/1989

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/06/2018

03/08/2018

1,730

82406/17

24/11/2017

Yevgeniy Vladimirovich

Danilov

07/05/1990

Boychenko Yegor Leonidovych

Strasbourg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20/06/2018

04/09/2018

13,000

4071/18

09/01/2018

Rishat Ramilyevich

Myazitov

21/06/1993

Studenkova Olga Aleksandrovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - ,

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Petrogradskiy District Court on 31/07/2017

18/09/2018

06/11/2018

7,050

4859/18

07/11/2017

Roman Vladimirovich

Kamalyan

13/11/1978

Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/07/2018

03/10/2018

8,000

4912/18

07/11/2017

Artur Vladimirovich

Kamalyan

16/01/1985

Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/07/2018

03/10/2018

8,000

8827/18

08/01/2018

Dmitriy Anatolyevich

Vopylev

25/10/1983

Antonova Yekaterina Vladimirovna

St Petersburg

18/09/2018

23/11/2018

3,555

9609/18

17/01/2018

Oleg Vladimirovich

Dzhaparov

24/01/1981

18/09/2018

27/11/2018

5,500

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255