Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KREKOTNEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 34140/17, 44777/17, 73931/17, 79364/17, 79612/17, 81562/17, 609/18, 1287/18, 2495/18, 3351/18, 3502/... • ECHR ID: 001-192242

Document date: March 7, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 6
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

KREKOTNEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 34140/17, 44777/17, 73931/17, 79364/17, 79612/17, 81562/17, 609/18, 1287/18, 2495/18, 3351/18, 3502/... • ECHR ID: 001-192242

Document date: March 7, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

This version was rectified on 7 August 2019 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court .

Application no. 34140/17 Vladimir Aleksandrovich KREKOTNEV against Russia and 16 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7 March 2019 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková , President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case s .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the application s out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 28 March 2019 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

34140/17

20/04/2017

Vladimir Aleksandrovich Krekotnev

03/04/1985

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

03/04/2018

01/06/2018

4,500

44777/17

16/06/2017

Viktor Gennadyevich Sokolov

07/07/1956

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

16/01/2018

23/02/2018

5,000

73931/17

29/09/2017

Maksim Yuryevich Aristov

22/08/1983

Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

16/07/2018

18/09/2018

4,500

79364/17

07/11/2017

Roman Ivanovich Moldoratov

08/05/1978

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

15/05/2018

02/07/2018

5,850

79612/17

11/11/2017

Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Mikolaychuk

13/10/1977

15/05/2018

11/07/2018

4,500

81562/17

23/11/2017

Timofey Nikolayevich Domnitskiy

04/10/1981

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

22/05/2018

23/07/2018

4,500

609/18

02/12/2017

Ivan Aleksandrovich Bogdanov

26/05/1992

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

24/07/2018

18/09/2018

4,500

1287/18

03/12/2017

Andrey Vasilyevich Obukhov

07/10/1980

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

24/07/2018

01/10/2018

4,500

2495/18

19/12/2017

Yuliya Aleksandrovna Kozachenko

30/12/1982

Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

16/07/2018

18/09/2018

4,500

3351/18

19/12/2017

Yevgeniy Gennadyevich Gertsev

29/08/1976

14/09/2018

09/11/2018

4,500

3502/18

11/12/2017

Sergey Vitalyevich Boginskiy

21/08/1988

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

16/07/2018

01/10/2018

4,500

3621/18

29/12/2017

Petr Aleksandrovich Larionov [2]

21/10/1968

Born Aleksandr Viktorovich

Kineshma

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

16/07/2018

26/09/2018

4,500

3783/18

12/12/2017

Viktor Svetoslavovich Zuyev

07/01/1979

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

23/07/2018

27/09/2018

4,500

4981/18

15/12/2017

Sergey Sergeyevich Kislykh

23/04/1984

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

14/09/2018

14/11/2018

4,500

6105/18

15/01/2018

Gennadiy Sergeyevich Antonov

17/01/1988

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inade quate conditions of detention.

24/07/2018

03/10/2018

4,500

7481/18

11/01/2018

Vasiliy Mikhaylovich Zarutskiy

20/03/1981

Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inade quate conditions of detention.

16/07/2018

18/09/2018

4,500

7852/18

29/01/2018

Aleksandr Nikolayevich Vishnyakov

11/09/1964

Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich

Kostroma

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inade quate conditions of detention.

14/09/2018

11/10/2018

4,500

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

[2] . Rectified on 7 August 2019 : the date of birth was "04/10/1982 ”

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846