Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

FADEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 5027/17;68721/17;7596/18;7868/18;7941/18;11632/18;21141/18;21486/18;23396/18;25533/18 • ECHR ID: 001-192595

Document date: March 21, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

FADEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 5027/17;68721/17;7596/18;7868/18;7941/18;11632/18;21141/18;21486/18;23396/18;25533/18 • ECHR ID: 001-192595

Document date: March 21, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 5027/17 Aleksey Vladimirovich FADEYEV against Russia and 9 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21 March 2019 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case s .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the other complaints under Article 13 (see the appended table) .

The applicant in application no. 21141/18 also complained about the conditions of detention during another period of detention, not covered by the unilateral declaration submitted by the Government.

The Court has examined this part of application no. 21141/18 and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention.

It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the application s out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention as well as the complaints under Article 13, as indicated in the appended table ;

Declares the remainder of application no. 21141/18 inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 11 April 2019 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s

declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

5027/17

09/01/2017

Aleksey Vladimirovich Fadeyev

03/01/1979

Romantsova Yekaterina Anatolyevna

Moscow

17/10/2017

01/12/2017

7,750

68721/17

11/09/2017

Yuriy Vladimirovich Bezzubov

13/01/1986

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

14/09/2018

02/01/2019

4,185

7596/18

21/11/2017

Stanislav Yevgenyevich Tovalovich

02/04/1989

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

14/09/2018

02/01/2019

13,500

7868/18

01/11/2017

Anton Sergeyevich Revenko

22/12/1977

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

14/09/2018

02/01/2019

6,300

7941/18

08/12/2017

Pavel Nikolayevich Kornilov

15/09/1989

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

14/09/2018

02/01/2019

6,075

11632/18

30/01/2018

Sergey Sergeyevich Kramarev

14/04/1982

Kozlov Andrey Borisovich

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.

04/10/2018

12/12/2018

9,500

21141/18

10/04/2018

Vitaliy Vasilyevich Chernyuk

16/10/1980

Ivanova Natalya Vladimirovna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

30/10/2018

15/01/2019

5,000

21486/18

14/04/2018

Sergey Andreyevich Kapustin

15/08/1982

Korobeynikov Grigoriy Anatolyevich

St Petersburg

30/10/2018

02/01/2019

2,260

23396/18

03/05/2018

Sergey Vladimirovich Kurbatov

15/06/1957

30/10/2018

15/01/2019

13,500

25533/18

02/04/2018

Aleksandr Olegovich Lastochkin

09/10/1995

30/10/2018

09/01/2019

2,625

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255