Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KRASNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 51315/17, 55865/17, 11667/18, 12000/18, 12212/18, 13190/18, 13847/18, 13889/18, 14056/18, 16905/18, ... • ECHR ID: 001-193308

Document date: April 25, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

KRASNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 51315/17, 55865/17, 11667/18, 12000/18, 12212/18, 13190/18, 13847/18, 13889/18, 14056/18, 16905/18, ... • ECHR ID: 001-193308

Document date: April 25, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 51315/17 Yevgeniy Veniaminovich KRASNOV against Russia and 13 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 April 2019 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application s .

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case s .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, as well as other complaints under the well-established case-law (see appended table), as covered by the unilateral declarations .

The applicant in application no. 16905/18 also complained about conditions of his detention in another facility.

The Court has examined the complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of application no. 16905/18 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the application s out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention as covered by the unilateral declarations, as well as other complaints under the well-established case-law (see the appended table) ;

Declares the remainder of application no. 16905/18 inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 16 May 2019 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case ‑ law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [1]

51315/17

04/06/2017

Yevgeniy Veniaminovich Krasnov

14/07/1985

16/01/2018

29/01/2019

11,500

55865/17

17/07/2017

Sergey Yuryevich Lapshin

25/07/1986

Stasyuk Olga Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/01/2018

08/03/2018

9,750

11667/18

21/01/2018

Ismoil Shodiyevich Ismoilov

19/02/1994

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

04/10/2018

12/12/2018

7,200

12000/18

15/02/2018

Andrey Kirillovich Khmanov

20/11/1989

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

04/10/2018

11/01/2019

5,900

12212/18

22/01/2018

Maksim Vladimirovich Maksimov

07/02/1983

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

04/10/2018

28/11/2018

3,600

13190/18

08/02/2018

Artur Raulevich Musin

27/06/1980

Stasyuk Olga Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

02/10/2018

26/11/2018

7,000

13847/18

05/02/2018

Ruslan Andreyevich Piotrovskiy

12/10/1988

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Conditions of transport by van, on several occasions between 05/05/2017 and 15/12/2017 (from detention facilities (IZ-47/1

St Petersburg) to a court house (Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg,

St Petersburg City Court) and to another remand prison (Kresty-2)

04/10/2018

02/01/2019

3,555

13889/18

09/03/2018

Sergey Aleksandrovich Novikov

03/09/1981

04/10/2018

15/01/2019

5,000

14056/18

10/03/2018

Telman Sabdullayevich Arabkhanov

18/12/1998

Golub Olga Viktorovna

Suzemka

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inad equate conditions of detention -

04/10/2018

22/11/2018

2,095

16905/18

12/02/2018

Marat Kutdusovich Nurgaliyev

22/03/1977

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

04/10/2018

11/12/2018

8,850

17159/18

07/03/2018

Fazliddin Fayzidinovich Khayetov

03/11/1992

04/10/2018

05/12/2018

1,365

19791/18

09/04/2018

Vladimir Viktorovich Golovkov

24/05/1964

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by overcrowded van to take part in court hearings between 22/01/2015 and until 29/10/2017,

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of detention and transport

02/10/2018

05/12/2018

14,400

19793/18

09/04/2018

Vladimir Vasilyevich Sobolev

12/07/1988

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

02/10/2018

05/12/2018

5,750

21541/18

23/04/2018

Sergey Viktorovich Osipov

07/05/1970

Zvonkova Yelena Yuryevna

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of detention and transport,

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by overcrowded van from the detention facility to take part in the investigative actions and court hearings between 19/05/2015 and 20/04/2018

02/10/2018

11/12/2018

14,400

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255