Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MATVIYENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 44255/17, 64678/17, 69109/17, 6939/18, 9057/18, 9081/18, 11153/18, 13803/18, 19330/18, 19441/18, 197... • ECHR ID: 001-193307

Document date: April 25, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

MATVIYENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 44255/17, 64678/17, 69109/17, 6939/18, 9057/18, 9081/18, 11153/18, 13803/18, 19330/18, 19441/18, 197... • ECHR ID: 001-193307

Document date: April 25, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 44255/17 Petr Alekseyevich MATVIYENKO against Russia and 13 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 April 2019 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková , President, Dmitry Dedov , Jolien Schukking , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application s .

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case s .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the application s out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 16 May 2019 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [1]

44255/17

10/01/2018

Petr Alekseyevich Matviyenko

02/01/1995

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/07/2018

18/09/2018

7,000

64678/17

04/12/2017

Maksim Valeryevich Pronin

24/11/1975

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/07/2018

25/09/2018

5,250

69109/17

21/11/2017

Pavel Aleksandrovich Yefimenko

24/09/1990

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

16/07/2018

04/10/2018

7,000

6939/18

13/03/2018

Aleksandr Sergeyevich Saburov

14/06/1987

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

04/10/2018

04/02/2019

1,730

9057/18

19/03/2018

Eduard Andreyevich Bobarykin

22/03/1989

02/10/2018

21/01/2019

3,920

9081/18

29/03/2018

Aleksey Viktorovich Ilyasov

16/07/1990

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

02/10/2018

09/01/2019

8,750

11153/18

10/02/2018

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Larshin

26/07/1985

04/10/2018

13/12/2018

11,500

13803/18

04/02/2018

Denis Aleksandrovich Sharkov

13/04/1992

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

04/10/2018

05/12/2018

4,750

19330/18

03/04/2018

Maksim Pavlovich Yefimov

28/04/1991

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

02/10/2018

11/12/2018

3,555

19441/18

30/03/2018

Aleksandr Fakhrad-zade Semenchenko

08/06/1994

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

02/10/2018

03/01/2019

2,460

19780/18

09/04/2018

Yegor Dmitriyevich Reginya

20/11/1986

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport in overcrowded van to take part in investigative actions or court hearings in the period between 11/05/2017 and 28/11/2017,

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of detention and transport between 11/05/2017 and 28/11/2017

02/10/2018

26/11/2018

4,920

19789/18

09/04/2018

Shokhin Shakhriyerovich Murodov

29/05/1980

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by overcrowded van to take part in investigative actions or court hearings in the period between 11/05/2017 and 28/11/2017,

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of detention and transport between 11/05/2017 and 28/11/2017

02/10/2018

28/11/2018

4,920

19795/18

09/04/2018

Sergey Vladimirovich Vlasov

18/01/1991

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by overcrowded van to taken part in investigative actions or court hearings in the period between 06/10/2016 and 16/11/2017,

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - to complain about poor conditions of detention and transport between 06/10/2016 and 16/11/2017

02/10/2018

28/11/2018

6,750

20856/18

16/04/2018

Artem Dmitriyevich Ponomarev

13/02/1986

02/10/2018

06/12/2018

1,730

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255