Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 29658/18;35823/18;40511/18;47350/18;48010/18;54735/18;59180/18;1500/19;6024/19;6697/19 • ECHR ID: 001-202270

Document date: March 5, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 29658/18;35823/18;40511/18;47350/18;48010/18;54735/18;59180/18;1500/19;6024/19;6697/19 • ECHR ID: 001-202270

Document date: March 5, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 29658/18 Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZVEREV against Russia and 9 other applications

(s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting on 5 March 2020 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková , President,

Dmitry Dedov ,

Gilberto Felici , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt , Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application s .

The Government acknowledged the excessive length of pre-trial detention . In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 26 March 2020 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Conve ntion

( excessive length of pre-trial detention )

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]

29658/18

07/06/2018

Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZVEREV

12/03/1997

03/07/2019

06/09/2019

2,600

35823/18

14/07/2018

Shamkhan Khuseynovich ABUYEV

11/06/1988

Bagdasaryan Innara Zhorayevna

Moscow

29/05/2019

19/09/2019

3,200

40511/18

15/08/2018

Dmitriy Gennadyevich VINOGRADOV

12/12/1980

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

15/07/2019

30/08/2019

3,500

47350/18

21/09/2018

Boris Vladimirovich KUNITSYN

27/06/1989

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

03/07/2019

02/09/2019

3,500

48010/18

24/09/2018

Nikolay Mikhaylovich KALININ

16/12/1981

03/07/2019

10/09/2019

2,300

54735/18

14/12/2018

Dmitriy Sergeyevich ATLASOV

20/11/1987

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal against detention order of 26/07/2018 was examined only on 21/08/2018.

03/07/2019

02/09/2019

1,500

59180/18

21/11/2018

Natalya Lvovna ZUBOVA

30/12/1958

Yezerskiy Aleksey Vladimirovich

Samara

29/05/2019

23/08/2019

4,550

1500/19

10/12/2018

Ramil Mukhammetovich SAFIN

14/02/1979

Burlachenko Sergey Nikolayevich

Moscow

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention - detention in IZ ‑ 77/4 Moscow since 23/03/2018; insufficient number of sleeping places, overcrowding.

03/07/2019

02/09/2019

5,700

6024/19

14/01/2019

Igor Anatolyevich KHRAMUSHIN

27/05/1970

Andreyev Denis Aleksandrovich

Samara

15/07/2019

18/09/2019

5,000

6697/19

16/01/2019

Vladimir Dmitriyevich ANDREYEV

04/08/1954

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal against the detention order of 18/07/2018 was examined only on 17/08/2018;

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - detention in a metal cage during the hearings before the Tsentralniy District Court of Tula, Proletarskiy District Court of Tula and Tule Regional Court (by way of videoconference) - the most recent occasion on 05/12/2018.

26/07/2019

06/09/2019

2,300

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846