Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SHELUKHA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 4103/18, 9045/18, 13274/18, 27704/18, 33267/18, 39527/18, 39534/18, 42585/18, 44278/18, 56221/18, 59... • ECHR ID: 001-203081

Document date: April 30, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

SHELUKHA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 4103/18, 9045/18, 13274/18, 27704/18, 33267/18, 39527/18, 39534/18, 42585/18, 44278/18, 56221/18, 59... • ECHR ID: 001-203081

Document date: April 30, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 4103/18 Yuriy Vyacheslavovich SHELUKHA against Russia and 16 other applications

( s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 30 April 2020 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková , President, Dmitry Dedov , Gilberto Felici , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application s .

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention . In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s insofar as covered by the terms of the unilateral declarations .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and other complaints under the well-established case-law, as covered by the unilateral declarations and described in the appended table .

In application no. 9045/18 the applicant also complained under Article 8 of the Convention about his allocation to a remote penal facility .

The Court has examined that complaint and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, that complaint either does not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of application no. 9045/18 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention as regards the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law and covered by the Government ’ s unilateral declarations (see the appended table) ;

Declares the remainder of application no. 9045/18 inadmissible.

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]

4103/18

12/07/2018

Yuriy Vyacheslavovich SHELUKHA

16/07/1987

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

24/03/2020

7,200

9045/18

29/01/2018

Firat Galiyevich SAMIGULLIN

27/01/1959

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

21/01/2020

27/02/2020

4,950

13274/18

25/02/2018

Dmitriy Nikolayevich VELKIN

27/10/1994

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

18/02/2020

24/03/2020

9,450

27704/18

23/07/2018

Nikolay Yakovlevich MEZHOV

16/10/1974

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

24/03/2020

7,650

33267/18

27/06/2018

Valeriy Pavlovich ZHUKOV

10/01/1968

05/02/2019

02/04/2019

4,500

39527/18

15/10/2018

Sergey Yuryevich KLIMENKO

02/12/1982

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

10/03/2020

6,750

39534/18

17/09/2018

Aleksey Anatolyevich GOLUBYATNIKOV

23/07/1981

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

13/03/2020

8,100

42585/18

17/08/2018

Ivan Aleksandrovich ZEMKIN

08/10/1988

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

16/03/2020

6,525

44278/18

22/10/2018

Ivan Aleksandrovich KRESHTOPA

02/05/1989

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

13/03/2020

4,500

56221/18

12/11/2018

Yevgeniy Valeryevich KAZAVKOV

18/04/1978

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

13/03/2020

6,525

59308/18

27/11/2018

Nikolay Mikhaylovich FEDOTOV

20/11/1982

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

18/02/2020

17/03/2020

7,200

7943/19

10/01/2019

Marat Gasanovich KURBANOV

04/11/1985

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

18/02/2020

24/03/2020

7,200

9085/19

26/01/2019

Omar Ismailovich MAMMAYEV

01/04/1976

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

21/01/2020

11/03/2020

4,500

10512/19

07/02/2019

Denis Borisovich SOLODOV

01/10/1984

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

14/01/2020

11/03/2020

6,075

19009/19

13/05/2019

Farkhad Rustamzhanovich KARIMOV

05/06/1981

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

21/01/2020

10/03/2020

4,500

25094/19

22/04/2019

Sergey Aleksandrovich ROZHNEV

08/01/1976

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

18/02/2020

19/03/2020

5,850

32728/19

05/06/2019

Irik Ralifovich IKHSANOV

15/04/1986

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

21/01/2020

10/03/2020

4,500

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846