LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
DURNYAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 76876/17;23598/18;27270/18;27976/18;32508/18;55732/18 • ECHR ID: 001-203079
Document date: April 30, 2020
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
DURNYAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 76876/17;23598/18;27270/18;27976/18;32508/18;55732/18 • ECHR ID: 001-203079
Document date: April 30, 2020
Cited paragraphs only
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 76876/17 Aleksey Viktorovich DURNYAK against Russia and 5 other applications
( s ee appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 30 April 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Alena Poláčková , President, Dmitry Dedov , Gilberto Felici , judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases , and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application s .
The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention . In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases .
The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .
The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list .
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .
Done in English and notified in writing on 4 June 2020 .
Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
( inadequate conditions of detention )
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Date of birth
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration
Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros) [1]
76876/17
18/12/2017
Aleksey Viktorovich DURNYAK
25/05/1982
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.
31/10/2019
29/11/2019
7,425
23598/18
23/04/2018
Sergey Sergeyevich FILIPENKO
31/01/1985
16/10/2018
12/09/2019
5,000
27270/18
02/05/2018
Dmitriy Sergeyevich SHCHEPELIN
27/06/1987
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.
19/02/2019
24/04/2019
4,500
27976/18
30/05/2018
Grigoriy Vladimirovich PASHIN
02/01/1980
11/03/2019
13/05/2019
4,612
32508/18
28/06/2018
Sergey Anatolyevich SKUZOVATOV
21/04/1964
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention.
11/03/2019
28/05/2019
5,512
55732/18
11/11/2018
Andrey Aleksandrovich CHEBOTAREV
26/11/1989
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;
Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transfers 03/08/2018-09/08/2018 and 09/11/2018-19/11/2018.
15/10/2019
19/11/2019
6,500
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
