Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ŞENOĞUL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 66728/10 • ECHR ID: 001-203069

Document date: May 14, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

ŞENOĞUL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 66728/10 • ECHR ID: 001-203069

Document date: May 14, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 66728/10 AyÅŸe ÅžENOÄžUL and O thers against Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 14 May 2020 as a Committee composed of:

Ivana Jelić , President, Arnfinn Bårdsen , Darian Pavli, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 October 2010 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The applicants were represented by Mr S. Sert , a lawyer practising in İzmir.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the de facto expropriation of the applicants ’ land and the interest rate applied to the compensation awarded to them were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter .

By letter dated 4 February 2020, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 15 October 2019 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants ’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants ’ representative received this letter on 12 February 2020. However, no response has been received.

THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 4 June 2020 .

Liv Tigerstedt Ivana Jelić              Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Applicant ’ s Name

Birth date

Nationality

Place of residence

1AyÅŸe ÅžENOÄžUL

05/02/1961

Turkish

İzmir

2Ahmet KI YAK

01/03/1959

Turkish

İzmir

3Mehmet KI YAK

01/03/1957

Turkish

İzmir

4Mustafa KI YAK

01/07/1968

Turkish

İzmir

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707