FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 34358/19 Anikó FAZEKAS against Hungary and 2 other applications

( s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11 June 2020 as a Committee composed of:

Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström , President, Georges Ravarani, Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicant s ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s and their representatives is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.

After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government submitted declaration s with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the application s .

The Government acknowledged the excessive length of civil proceedings . In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amount s detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amount s would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them , from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases .

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declaration s .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case s should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the application s .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Liv Tigerstedt Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

( excessive length of civil proceedings )

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [1]

34358/19

31/05/2019

Anikó FAZEKAS

24/05/1985

X. Pál Zoltán

Bduapest

25/02/2020

26/02/2020

5,200

40490/19

24/07/2019

Dávid Márton LÁSZLÓ

27/11/1977

Karsai Dániel András

Budapest

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings

12/02/2020

13/03/2020

2,500

41323/19

29/07/2019

József VIDÁK

24/11/1939

Németh Sándor

Budapest

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings.

10/02/2020

13/03/2020

6,500

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.