KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 11488/16 • ECHR ID: 001-205719
Document date: September 29, 2020
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 11488/16 Vladislav Vladimirovich KUZNETSOV against Russia
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 29 September 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Alena Poláčková , President, Dmitry Dedov , Gilberto Felici , judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 January 2016 ,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Vladislav Vladimirovich Kuznetsov , was born in 1985.
The applicant was represented by Mr Y.A. Mikhaylov , a lawyer practising in Kirov.
The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the disenfranchisement on the ground that he is, or has been, a convicted prisoner were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter .
By letter dated 7 February 2020, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 7 January 2020 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received this letter on 21 February 2020. However, no response has followed.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 22 October 2020 .
Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
