Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SETÉT v. HUNGARY

Doc ref: 6205/20 • ECHR ID: 001-207708

Document date: December 17, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

SETÉT v. HUNGARY

Doc ref: 6205/20 • ECHR ID: 001-207708

Document date: December 17, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 6205/20 Zoltán SETÉT against Hungary

(s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 17 December 2020 as a Committee composed of:

Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Wennerström , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 January 2020,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant ’ s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant was represented by Ms D.S. Kiss, a lawyer practising in Budapest.

The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention was communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”) .

THE LAW

Complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (excessive length of pre ‑ trial detention)

In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, this complaint is inadmissible.

In particular, the Court notes that, although the applicant was detained for roughly one year and eight months (see appended table), the national authorities advanced relevant and sufficient reasons for the detention of the applicant, notably fear of his absconding (the applicant, wanted for aggravated robbery, had been apprehended abroad), of collusion (he had exerted pressure on a witness) and repetition of crime (the offence in question had been committed while other prosecutions were ongoing against the applicant). In light of these elements, the measure in question was justified and did not exceed a reasonable duration.

In view of the above, the Court finds that this complaint is manifestly ill ‑ founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Declares the application inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021 .

Liv Tigerstedt Krzysztof Wojtyczek Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention

( excessive length of pre-trial detention )

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Year of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Period of detention

Length of detention

6205/20

20/01/2020

Zoltán SETÉT

1985Kiss Dominika Szilvia

Budapest

28/04/2018 to

13/01/2020

1 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 17 day(s)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846