YERESKO v. UKRAINE
Doc ref: 61555/12 • ECHR ID: 001-208476
Document date: February 4, 2021
- 1 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 61555/12 Mykhaylo Yevgenovych YERESKO against Ukraine
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 4 February 2021 as a Committee composed of:
Ivana Jelić , President, Ganna Yudkivska , Arnfinn Bårdsen , judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 September 2012 ,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Mykhaylo Yevgenovych Yeresko , is a Ukrainian national, who was born in 1964 and lives in Simferopol.
On 16 March 2020 the applicant ’ s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning an alleged interference with his property rights was communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”).
On the same date, the Court informed the applicant about the necessity to be represented by an advocate at that stage of the proceedings and instructed him to appoint one. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to the fact that in case of his failure to appoint a lawyer, the Court might conclude that he was no longer interested in pursuing the application and might decide to strike it out of its list of cases.
In the absence of any reply, on 3 June 2020 the Court re-sent its letter of 16 March 2020 to the applicant, this time by express delivery service (DHL). According to the tracking system, the correspondence of 3 June 2020 was delivered at the applicant ’ s address on 22 June 2020 and received by Yeresko I.V., presumably the applicant ’ s relative. However, there has been no response forthcoming.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 25 February 2021 .
{signature_p_2}
Liv Tigerstedt Ivana Jelić Acting Deputy Registrar President