FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 50415/15 Constantin- Cătălin CRĂCIUN against Romania and 4 other applications

(s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 18 February 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”) .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

The Government pleaded mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences. They asked the Court to reject the present applications for being incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention.

The applicants disagreed, claiming that the compensation awarded to them had been insufficient.

The Court notes that in its recent decision Dîrjan and Ştefan v. Romania (( dec. ), nos. 14224/15 and 50977/15, 15 April 2020) it has examined similar applications as the ones in the present case and declared them inadmissible considering that the applicants had lost their victim status. The Court noted that Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences, adopted following the pilot judgment in the case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania (nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017) and in force between October 2017 and December 2019, had been an effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention in Romanian prisons. More specifically, the above law had set forth a compensatory remedy, available for periods of detention ranging from 2012 to 2019 and allowing the deduction of six days for 30 days spent in conditions of detention that fell short of standards compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Dîrjan and Ştefan , cited above, § 28). This benefit had impact on the term of the prison sentences giving detainees an opportunity of earlier release on parole.

Turning to the circumstances of the present cases, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility of these complaints. The above-mentioned remedy was available to the applicants in the present applications and, indeed, they benefitted from it. Thus, on different dates, the domestic authorities, applying the provisions described in the abovementioned decision Dîrjan and Ştefan , awarded compensation, through the reduction of days, to the applicants for the entire period of detention spent in inadequate conditions of which they complained (for further details see the appended table).

The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention insofar as the conditions of their detention, described in the appended table, are concerned. It follows that the applications in this part are incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

In application no. 50415/15 the applicant also raised complaints under Article 3 of the Convention in relation to a period of detention preceding the detention period specified in the appended table.

The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, they do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention as they were lodged outside the six-month time-limit.

It follows that this part of application no. 50415/15 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 11 March 2021 .

             {signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention ( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Year of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Domestic compensation awarded

(in days)

based on total period calculated domestically

50415/15

26/11/2015

Constantin- Cătălin CRĂCIUN

1983Andreea Larisa Crăciun

Piatra-NeamÈ›

Rahova , Iași and Vaslui Prisons

12/12/2014 to 07/11/2017

2 years and 10 months and 26 days

360 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012-07/11/2017

515/16

22/02/2016

Florin IONESCU

1980Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Rahova and Craiova Prisons

18/08/2015 to 12/09/2018

3 years and 29 days

216 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 18/08/2015-12/09/2018

11452/16

15/04/2016

Nae GALOIU

1970Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Rahova , Focșani , Galați and Tulcea Prisons

07/01/2015 to 30/05/2018

3 years and 4 months and 24 days

240 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 07/01/2015-30/05/2018

16203/16

10/05/2016

Aurel FIÈšA

1991Codlea Prison

03/06/2015 to 15/11/2017

2 years and 5 months and 13 days

174 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 03/06/2015- 15/11/2017

17031/16

07/06/2016

Victoria DOMNU

1973Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Bucharest Central Arrest Centre and Targsor Prison

11/11/2014 to 06/11/2018

3 years and 11 months and 27 days

288 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 11/11/2014- 06/11/2018