Search
document

Document text Analytics

BAIA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 16731/05;15513/06 • ECHR ID: 001-209282

Document date: March 11, 2021

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

BAIA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 16731/05;15513/06 • ECHR ID: 001-209282

Document date: March 11, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Applications nos. 16731/05 and 15513/06 Speran È› a BAIA against Romania and Gheorghe-Tudor JEBELEANU and Florica VIERU-JEBELEANU against Romania (s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11 March 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking , Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The applicants ’ complaints in both applications under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, concerning their inability to recover possession of their property nationalised under the former communist regime and sold by the State to third parties, were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). In both cases the Government submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.

By letters sent by registered post in October and November 2020, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations or of certain requested information had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants ’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar procedural conduct of the applicants, the Court finds it appropriate to examine the applications jointly in a single decision.

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications.

Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 1 April 2021 .

{signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Applications raising complaints under Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 to the Convention

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Year of birth

Date of the

Court ’ s

registered letter

Date of

receipt of the

registered

letter

Time-limit for

submission

by the applicant of the

information requested

16731/05

19/04/2005

Speran È› a BAIA

1947

27/11/2020

5/01/2021

Initial time-limit

6/11/2020, no new

time-limit given in the registered letter

15513/06

10/04/2006

Gheorghe - Tudor JEBELEANU

1949Florica VIERU-JEBELEANU

1951

7/10/2020

20/11/2020

13/10/2020

Letter sent back to the Court on 12/12/2020 after the expiration of the storage period

Initial time-limit

24/09/2020, no new

time-limit given in the

registered letter

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant