Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MARKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 57843/13;8453/19;60809/19;2585/20;18218/20 • ECHR ID: 001-209474

Document date: March 25, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

MARKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 57843/13;8453/19;60809/19;2585/20;18218/20 • ECHR ID: 001-209474

Document date: March 25, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 57843/13 Maksim Yuryevich MARKOV against Russia and 4 other applications

(s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 March 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Darian Pavli, President, Dmitry Dedov , Peeter Roosma , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the formal declaration s accepting a friendly settlement of the case s ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention concerning the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention (see the appended table).

The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations , signed by the parties, under which the applicant s agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision .

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 15 April 2021 .

             {signature_p_2}

Liv Tigerstedt Darian Pavli Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention

( permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities )

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Year of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant ’ s declaration

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]

57843/13

08/08/2013

Maksim Yuryevich MARKOV

1984Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - linked to the complaints about video surveillance and inadequate conditions of detention ;

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention - detention in remand prison

no. IZ-24/1 in Krasnoyarsk from 03/08/2013 to 16/01/2014 and from 24/02/2014 to 09/05/2014.

15/01/2021

19/01/2021

2,000

8453/19

08/01/2019

Sergey Vyacheslavovich LOYEV

1972Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in correctional colony IK-6 Khabarovsk Region from 09/05/2018 to date.

15/01/2021

15/01/2021

6,000

60809/19

14/11/2019

Aleksandr Alekseyevich STEPANOV

1987Gasenko Vadim Aleksandrovich

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention ;

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in

IK-6 in Chuvashiya Republic from 05/09/2019 - to date.

15/01/2021

18/01/2021

5,000

2585/20

12/12/2019

Vitaliy Aleksandrovich YAKIMOV

1984Gasenko Vadim Aleksandrovich

St Petersburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention ;

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in

IK-6 in Chuvashiya Republic, from 13/02/2014 to date.

15/01/2021

18/01/2021

5,000

18218/20

16/03/2020

Aleksey Anatolyevich BELYAYEV

1979Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and constant video surveillance ;

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in

IK-6 Khabarovsk Region from 09/12/2017 to date.

19/11/2020

15/12/2020

5,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846