Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KISELEV v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 26114/18 • ECHR ID: 001-209581

Document date: March 25, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

KISELEV v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 26114/18 • ECHR ID: 001-209581

Document date: March 25, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 26114/18 Konstantin Sergeyevich KISELEV against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 March 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Darian Pavli, President, Dmitry Dedov , Peeter Roosma , judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 May 2018 ,

Having regard to the formal declaration s accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant ’ s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant was represented by Mr A.V. Danilenkov , a lawyer practising in St Petersburg.

The applicant ’ s complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) .

The Court received the friendly-settlement declaration , signed by the parties, under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 15 April 2021 .

             {signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Darian Pavli Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention

(Alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings in view of restrictions on the defendant ’ s right to examine witnesses)

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Year of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant ’ s declaration

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

26114/18

17/05/2018

Konstantin Sergeyevich KISELEV

1996Aleksey Vladimirovich Danilenkov

St Petersburg

15/01/2021

20/07/2020

7,800

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846