Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

STUPAK v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 5251/18 • ECHR ID: 001-209578

Document date: March 25, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

STUPAK v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 5251/18 • ECHR ID: 001-209578

Document date: March 25, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 5251/18 Larisa Aleksandrovna STUPAK against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 March 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Darian Pavli, President, Dmitry Dedov , Peeter Roosma , judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 January 2018 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Ms Larisa Aleksandrovna Stupak, was born in 1971.

The applicant was represented by Mr Kolesnikov, a lawyer practising in Volgograd.

The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 to the Convention concerning the unjustified and disproportionate interference with her property rights on account of domestic judgments ordering demolition of her immovable property were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter .

By letters dated 24 June 2020, sent by registered post, the applicant and her representative were notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant ’ s observations had expired on 5 March 2020 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The representative and the applicant received the letters on 9 July and 16 July 2020, respectively. However, no response has followed.

THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 15 April 2021 .

             {signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Darian Pavli              Acting Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707