Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF R.Sz. v. HUNGARYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES RAIMONDI, JOÄŒIENE AND LORENZEN
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2013. Community Plant Variety Office v Ralf Schräder.
CASE OF AQUILINA v. MALTAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BONELLO
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010. Pedro Manuel Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA.
CASE OF SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KJØLBRO
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2019. Christa Plessers v PREFACO NV and Belgische Staat.
CASE OF SOCIEDADE DE CONSTRUCOES MARTINS AND VIEIRA, LDA v. PORTUGAL
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021. DP and SG v Trapeza Peiraios AE.
CASE OF POMUL S.R.L. AND SUBERVIN S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 88/93 of 19 January 1993 introducing a countervailing charge on fresh lemons originating in Cyprus

Document text Analytics

BUSINESS-INVESTIȚII PENTRU TOȚI S.A. AND LUX EDEM CONSULTING S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Doc ref: 70038/14 • ECHR ID: 001-209544

Document date: March 25, 2021

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 1

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

W unique documents citing • B citations total to j paragraphs

Outbound citations

k unique documents cited • N citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846