NERSISYAN v. ARMENIA
Doc ref: 2324/12 • ECHR ID: 001-211499
Document date: July 1, 2021
- Inbound citations: 1
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 2324/12 Serob NERSISYAN against Armenia
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1 July 2021 as a Committee composed of:
Jolien Schukking , President, Armen Harutyunyan, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 December 2011 ,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Serob Nersisyan , was born in 1959. He was represented by Mr M. Ghazaryan, a lawyer practising in Haykashen , Armenia.
The applicant ’ s complaints under Articles 2 and 13 of the Convention concerning hi s son ’ s death as a result of allegedly inadequate medical assistance in a hospital and concerning the lack of an effective domestic remedy were communicated to the Armenian Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his observations in reply. No response was received to the Registry ’ s letter .
By letter dated 9 June 2016, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 3 May 2016, and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has been received to that letter either.
The Court has not received any correspondence from the applicant since 31 August 2012.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 22 July 2021 .
{signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Jolien Schukking Acting Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
