MANUKYAN v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 20069/17 • ECHR ID: 001-213050
Document date: October 7, 2021
- Inbound citations: 1
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 20069/17 Levon Gareginovich MANUKYAN against Russia
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7 October 2021 as a Committee composed of:
Peeter Roosma, President, Dmitry Dedov, Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 February 2017,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Levon Gareginovich Manukyan, was born in 1961.
The applicant was represented by Mr A. Girenkov, a lawyer practising in Aleysk.
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning impartiality of the tribunal and lack of access to legal advice were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
By letter dated 22 March 2021, sent to the applicant’s representative through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 19 January 2021 and that no extension of time had been requested. His attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was downloaded by the applicant’s representative on 23 March 2021 and no response to it has been received by the Court.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 28 October 2021.
{signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma Acting Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
