LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
SENGEZER, IZGI, SITILAY, IZGI, ATMAN, MURATAKAN, UILDIRIM, DELIDERE AND ÖNEN v. TURKEY
Doc ref: 28512/95;28513/95;28514/95;28515/95;30646/96;30647/96;30648/96;30649/96;30650/96;30651/96 • ECHR ID: 001-5805
Document date: March 22, 2001
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
SENGEZER, IZGI, SITILAY, IZGI, ATMAN, MURATAKAN, UILDIRIM, DELIDERE AND ÖNEN v. TURKEY
Doc ref: 28512/95;28513/95;28514/95;28515/95;30646/96;30647/96;30648/96;30649/96;30650/96;30651/96 • ECHR ID: 001-5805
Document date: March 22, 2001
Cited paragraphs only
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
Applications nos. 28512-28515/95, 30646 ‑ 30651/96 by Celal ÅžENGEZER, Ercan Ä°ZGÄ°, Sait ŞİTÄ°LAY, Mehmet Zülküf Ä°ZGÄ°, Salih and Ali ATMAN, Mahfuz MURATAKAN, Mehmet YILDIRIM, Rıza DELÄ°DERE and Abdurrahman ÖNEN against Turkey
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) , sitting on 22 March 2001 as a Chamber composed of
Mr C.L. Rozakis , President , Mr A.B. Baka , Mr G. Bonello , Mrs V. Strážnická , Mr P. Lorenzen , Mr M. Fischbach , judges , Mr F. Gölcüklü , ad hoc judge ,
and Mr E. Fribergh , Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above applications introduced with the European Commission of Human Rights on 3 and 4 August and 15 December 1995 and registered on 12 September 1995 and 26 March 1996,
Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the applications was transferred to the Court,
Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND COMPLAINTS
The applicants are Turkish nationals living in the Lice district of the province of Diyarbakır (Turkey). They are represented before the Court by Mr Hasip Kaplan, a lawyer practising in Istanbul.
In their applications the applicant s complained that their houses and shops were destroyed as a result of the random and disproportionate gunfire of the security forces in the course of clashes between the latter and PKK militants in Lice. They alleged that their rights guaranteed by Articles 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 17 and 18 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 had been violated.
PROCEDURE
Following informal cont acts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.
As a result, the Registrar proposed that the applicants withdraw the applications on the condition that the Government pay to the applicants the sums stated below f ree of any taxes which may be applicable and to be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment:
No.
Application No.
Name of the Applicant
The Registrar’s proposal: Pounds sterling
1
28512/95
Celal ÅžENGEZER
15,000
2
28513/95
Ercan Ä°ZGÄ°
10,000
3
28514/95
Sait ŞİTİLAY
15,000
4
28515/95
Mehmet Zülküf İZGİ
15,000
5
30646/96
Salih ATMAN
10,000
6
30647/96
Ali ATMAN
10,000
7
30648/96
Mahfuz MURATAKAN
15,000
8
30649/96
Mehmet YILDIRIM
15,000
9
30650/96
Rıza DELİDERE
10,000
10
30651/96
Abdurrahman ÖNEN
10,000
By letters of 19 January and 2 February 2001 the Government and the applicants respectively a greed to the proposal.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the applicants’ withdrawal of the applications on the basis of the agreement reached between the parties (Article 37 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention). The Court considers that there is no reason which would justify the continuation of the examination of the applications.
For these reasons, the Court
Decides to disjoin the instant applications from the other 201 Lice applications;
Decides to join the instant applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of the list .
Erik Fribergh Christos Rozakis Registrar President
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025
