Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SZOFER v. POLAND

Doc ref: 34447/97 • ECHR ID: 001-22942

Document date: December 17, 2002

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

SZOFER v. POLAND

Doc ref: 34447/97 • ECHR ID: 001-22942

Document date: December 17, 2002

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

FINAL DECISION

Application no. 34447/97 by Marek SZOFER against Poland

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section) , sitting on 17 December 2002 as a Chamber composed of

Sir Nicolas Bratza , President , Mr M. Pellonpää , Mr A. Pastor Ridruejo , Mrs V. Strážnická , Mr R. Maruste , Mr S. Pavlovschi , Mr L. Garlicki , judges , and Mr M. O’Boyle , Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 31 March 1996,

Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court,

Having regard to the partial decision of 14 September 2000,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant,  Marek Szofer, is a Polish national, who was born in 1961.

A. The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant , may be summarised as follows.

1. Criminal proceedings against the applicant

On 16 October 1995 the applicant was arrested. On 18 October 1995 he was brought before the Sieradz District Prosecutor and detained on remand on charges of forgery, committed in an organised group. On 8 November 1995 the Sieradz District Court upheld the applicant’s detention order.

On 29 July 1996 the bill of indictment against the applicant was lodged with the Sieradz District Court. The first hearing in this case was scheduled for 3 October 1996.

On 5 July 1999 the Sieradz District Court convicted the applicant of several counts of forgery and sentenced him to two years and eight months’ imprisonment. By a judgment of 21 March 2000 the Sieradz Regional Court confirmed this judgment .

2. Intercepting of the applicant’s correspondence

The following letters of the applicant to the Secretariat of the European Commission of Human Rights were subjected to automatic screening by the prison authorities and the prosecutor, provided for by law, as shown by relevant stamps on the envelopes: 24 July 1996, 6 November 1996, 7 and 15 November 1996, 2 December 1996.

Further, the application form submitted by the applicant to the Commission on 2 January 1997 has also been intercepted, opened and read.

COMPLAINT

The applicant complained under about the length of the criminal proceedings against him.

The Court also noted that the applicant’s correspondence with the Convention organs was subjected to automatic screening, provided for by relevant Polish legislation, applicable at the material time.

THE LAW

The Court notes that the applicant failed to submit within the time-limit his reply to the observations submitted by the respondent Government on 18 December 2000. The applicant also failed to respond to the five further communications from the Registry of the Court, the last of which was a registered letter dated 22 October 2002.

Having regard to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, the Court concludes that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the examination of the application to be continued.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Michael O’Boyle Nicolas Bratza Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846