Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF RACOLTEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments
Council Regulation (EC) No 1600/96 of 30 July 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3438/92 laying down special measures for the transport of certain fresh fruit and vegetables originating in Greece as regards their period of application
Commission Regulation (EC) No 532/2001 of 16 March 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 2561/1999 laying down the marketing standard for peas
Commission Regulation (EC) No 508/2006 of 29 March 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 as regards export licences for milk powder exported to the Dominican Republic
CASE OF NA. AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 979/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 relating to temporary Judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal
CASE OF ROHLENA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Judgment of the Court of 15 December 1993. Ruth Hünermund and others v Landesapothekerkammer Baden-Württemberg.

Document text Analytics

ILVESVIITA-SALLINEN v. FINLAND

Doc ref: 59578/00 • ECHR ID: 001-24010

Document date: June 22, 2004

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

T unique documents citing • 6 citations total to 2 paragraphs

Outbound citations

E unique documents cited • B citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846