FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 3415/06 by Mariya Konstantinovna LOSEVA against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 24 January 2008 as a Chamber composed of:

Christos Rozakis , President, Loukis Loucaides , Nina Vajić , Anatoli Kovler , Elisabeth Steiner , Khanlar Hajiyev , Dean Spielmann , judges, and Søren Nielsen , Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 November 2005,

Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a f riendly settlement of the case,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant, Ms Mariya Konstantinovna Loseva , is a Russian national who was born in 1940 and lives in Voronezh . She was represented before the Court by Mr A. Rashevskiy , a lawyer practising in Voronezh . The Russian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by Mr P. Laptev, the former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights, and subsequently by their new Representative, Mrs V. Milinchuk .

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 15 December 2000 the Levoberezhniy District Court of Voronezh awarded the applicant 997.32 Russian roubles for index- linking of her late pension payments in line with inflation. The judgment came into force on 25 December 2000 and was enforced in December 2005.

COMPLAINTS

The applicant complain ed under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement by the State of the final judgment in her favour .

THE LAW

By the letter of 2 October 2007 the applicant informed the Court that she had reached a friendly settlement with the Government and was to sign an agreement to that effect.

On 25 October 2007 the Government informed the Court that the parties had signed a friendly settlement agreement whereby the Government would pay the applicant 3,000 euros in full and final resolution of the case, costs and expenses included.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis Registrar President