Browsing history:

↳
5 CASES AGAINST TURKEY (SEE APPENDIX) CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATION'S DELAY IN PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION AND THE APPLICABLE RATE OF DEFAULT INTEREST
5 CASES AGAINST TURKEY (SEE APPENDIX) CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATION'S DELAY IN PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION AND THE APPLICABLE RATE OF DEFAULT INTEREST
CASE OF ELISEI-UZUN AND ANDONIE v. ROMANIA
4 CASES AGAINST TURKEY (SEE APPENDIX) CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATION'S DELAY IN PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION AND THE APPLICABLE RATE OF DEFAULT INTEREST
CASE OF DZHAKSYBERGENOV (AKA JAXYBERGENOV) v. UKRAINE
2 CASES AGAINST TURKEY (SEE APPENDIX) CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATION'S DELAY IN PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION AND THE APPLICABLE RATE OF DEFAULT INTEREST
FORMELA v. POLAND
BOREKS - 95 v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2742/78 of 24 November 1978 amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 1799/76 in respect of the closing date for the submission of crop declarations for seed flax
JURIĆ v. CROATIA

Document text Analytics

PLOTINA v. LATVIA

Doc ref: 16825/02 • ECHR ID: 001-87123

Document date: June 3, 2008

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 3

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

d unique documents citing • U citations total to I paragraphs

Outbound citations

s unique documents cited • q citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707