THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 34438/05 by Maria ZANET against Romania

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24 March 20 0 9 as a Chamber composed of:

Josep Casadevall , President, Elisabet Fura-Sandström , Corneliu Bîrsan , Alvina Gyulumyan , Egbert Myjer , Ineta Ziemele , Ann Power , judges, and Santiago Quesada, Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 September 2005,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a f riendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant, Ms Maria Zanet, is a Romanian national who was born in 1939 and lives in Constanta . The Romanian Government ( “ the Government”) were r epresented by their Agent, Mr Răzvan ­ HoraÅ£iu Radu, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 8 June 1995, the applicant filed a claim with the Constanta Court of First Instance, concerning the division of an inheritance. The applicant ’ s claim was finally dismissed.

The proceedings lasted for more than nine years and nine months for three levels of jurisdiction before seven courts and where finally settled on 14 March 2005 by the Constanta Court of Appeal.

COMPLAINTS

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the civil proceedings instituted against them.

The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that she had been deprived of his possessions.

THE LAW

On 8 December 2008 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:

“ I, agent of the Romanian Government before the European Court of Hyman Rights , declare that the Government of Romania offer to pay ex gratia a global sum of 3 000 € (three thousand euros ) to Ms Maria Zanet with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be converted into new Romanian lei at the rate applicable on the date of payment, free of any taxes that may be applicable and payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute th e final resolution of the case. ”

On 25 September 2008 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:

“ I, Maria Zanet , applicant , note that the Government of Romania are prepared to pay me ex gratia the global sum of 3 000 € (three thousand euros ) with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be converted into new Romanian lei at the rate applicable on the date of payment, free of any taxes that may be applicable and payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default perio d plus three percentage points.

I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case. ”

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Santiago Quesada Josep Casadevall Registrar President