Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SEIDOVA v. GEORGIA

Doc ref: 16956/09 • ECHR ID: 001-96289

Document date: November 24, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

SEIDOVA v. GEORGIA

Doc ref: 16956/09 • ECHR ID: 001-96289

Document date: November 24, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 16956/09 by Baghdagul SEIDOVA against Georgia

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 24 November 2009 as a Chamber composed of:

Françoise Tulkens , President, Vladimiro Zagrebelsky , Danutė Jočienė , Dragoljub Popović , András Sajó , Nona Tsotsoria , Kristina Pardalos , judges, and François e Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 December 2008,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant, M r s Baghdagul Seidova, is a Georgian national who was born in 1945. She was represented before the Court by Mr Z . Rostiashvili, a lawyer practising in Tbilisi. The Georgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr L. Meskhoradze of the Ministry of Justice .

On 22 April 2009 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant ’ s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the lack of treatment of her cardio-vascular problems in prison.

On 27 April and 15 September 2009 the Government submitted medical information on the applicant ’ s state of health as well as their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application . Those submissions disclosed that the applicant had started receiving the relevant treatment.

On 15 September 2009 the applicant informed the Court that she wished to withdraw her application as the matter had been resolved. The Government did not object.

THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to lift the interim measure indicated by the Court and to strike the application out of its list of cases.

             Françoise Elens-Passos Françoise Tulkens Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846