Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BARANOV v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 6764/07 • ECHR ID: 001-98585

Document date: April 27, 2010

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

BARANOV v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 6764/07 • ECHR ID: 001-98585

Document date: April 27, 2010

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 6764/07 by Vasiliy Vasilyevich BARANOV against Ukraine

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27 April 2010 as a Chamber composed of:

Peer Lorenzen , President, Renate Jaeger , Rait Maruste , Mark Villiger , Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, Mykhaylo Buromenskiy , ad hoc judge, and Claudia Westerdiek , Section Registrar

Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 December 2006,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The application was lodged by Mr Vasiliy Vasilyevich Baranov, a Ukrainian national who was born in 1952 . He was represented before the Court by S.A. Bezkrovny y , a lawyer practising in Nova Kahovka . The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev .

The applicant complained under Article s 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non-enforcement of the judgment given in his favour against a State entity.

On 14 January 2009 the President of the Fifth Section decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, to communicate the application to the Government.

By letter of 29 December 2009, the applicant ' s lawyer informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 5 November 2009. There was no person expressing the wish to pursue the application.

THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, the Court finds that there exists no general interest in the present case which necessitates proceeding with the examination of the complaints raised. Accordingly, the conditions in which a case may be struck out of its list, as provided in Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, are satisfied.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846