Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SAYAN v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 846/07;8359/07;31511/07;44791/07;61041/08;30662/09;39148/09 • ECHR ID: 001-99110

Document date: May 11, 2010

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

SAYAN v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 846/07;8359/07;31511/07;44791/07;61041/08;30662/09;39148/09 • ECHR ID: 001-99110

Document date: May 11, 2010

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

PARTIAL DECISION

AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

Application no. 846/07 by Gülsüm SAYAN and 6 other applications [1] against Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 11 May 2010 as a Chamber composed of:

Françoise Tulkens , President, Ireneu Cabral Barreto , Danutė Jočienė , András Sajó , Nona Tsotsoria , Işıl Karakaş , Kristina Pardalos , judges, and Sally Dollé , Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 December 2006 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicants are Turkish nationals. Their names, birth dates and present addresses, as well as the names of their representatives, appear in Appendix I.

The facts common to all applications, as submitted by the applicants, are as follows.

On various dates the applicants were arrested and then placed in detention on remand within the context of criminal proceedings against them. Subsequently, they were all acquitted. On termination of the criminal proceedings, they sued the Treasury, seeking compensation for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, pursuant to Law no. 466 pertaining to the payment of compensation to persons unlawfully arrested or detained.

All applicants complain about the length of the compensation proceedings. The other complaints raised by the applicants and the specific facts relevant to the issue of the allegedly lengthy proceedings are set out in the table below.

Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings, which were brought on the basis of Law no. 466, appear in Appendix II.

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Case-specific f acts

Total length of proceedings

Other complaints

1

846/07 Sayan

21/12/2006

-

Beginning: 2/7/2002

First-instance court: 30/6/2004

Final decision : Pending before the Court of Cassation.

7 years and 8 months

Article 5 § 5: Lack of compensation for unlawful detention.

Article 6: The non-payment of interest despite the depreciation of the national currency.

2

8359/07 DaÄŸhan

7/2/2007

-

Beginning: 21/4/2000

First-instance court: 7/6/2004

Final decision : 28/6/2006

Payment: 10/4/2007

7 years

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: The non-payment of interest despite the depreciation of the national currency.

3

31511/07 AvÅŸar

11/7/2007

-

Beginning: 11/10/1999

First-instance court: 7/3/2007

Final decision : Pending before the Court of Cassation.

10 years and 4 months

Articles 8 and 13: Merely invoking the Provisions.

4

44791/07 Adaman

10/10/2007

In 1999 the applicant was placed in detention on remand on suspicion of homicide. On 2/10/2000 she was acquitted. This judgment became final on 22/5/2002. Subsequently, she brought compensation proceedings under Law no. 466.

Beginning: 2/1/2003

First-instance court: 30/3/2006

Final decision : 30/4/2007

Payment: 20/3/2008

5 years and 2 months

Article 5 : Unlawfulness of detention.

Articles 6 and 13 : 1) Lack of a fair hearing concerning the criminal proceedings against the applicant.

2) Insufficiency of the amount of compensation awarded.

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 : The non-payment of the compensation awarded by the court.

5

61041/08 Özkorkmaz

26/11/2008

-

Beginning: 23/5/2003

First-instance court: 15/6/2004

Final decision : 4/2/2008 (served on the applicant on 2/3/2009)

Payment: not made at the time of application.

6 years and 10 months

Article 13 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: Insufficiency of the amount of compensation awarded by the court.

6

30662/09 Sarıtaş

27/4/2009

-

Beginning: 25/9/1998

First-instance court: 13/9/2007

Final decision : 5/3/2009

Payment: not made at the time of application.

11 years and 5 months

-

7

39148/09 Saday

10/7/2009

The applicant was arrested in 1995. On 3/2/1997 she was released pending trial and on 17/11/1998 she was acquitted of the charges against her. Subsequently, she brought compensation proceedings under Law no. 466.

Beginning: 4/8/1999

First-instance court: 6/3/2009

Final decision : Pending before the Court of Cassation.

10 years and 7 months

Article 5: Unlawfulness of detention and the lack of compensation.

THE LAW

1. The Court finds it appropriate to join the cases, given the applicants ' common principal complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the excessive length of proceedings to which they were parties. These proceedings lasted for periods ranging from 5 years and 2 months to 11 years and 5 months .

In applications nos. 846/07 and 8369/07, invoking Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants maintained that the amounts determined by the domestic authorities had not compensate d their financial loss caused by the depreciation of the national currency , as no interest had been applied to the awards made under Law no. 466 .

The Court considers that it cannot, on the basis of the case file, determine the admissibility of these complaints and that it is therefore necessary, in accordance with Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, to give notice of them to the respondent Government.

2. The Court has also examined the remainder of the applicants ' complaints as submitted by them . However, having regard to all the material in its possession, it finds that those complaints do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or it s Protocols. It follows that the remaining part s of the application s must be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to adjourn the examination of the applicants ' complaint s concerning the length of proceedings and the non-application of interest to the compensation awards under Law no. 466 ;

Declares the remainder of the application s inadmissible.

Sally Dollé Françoise Tulkens Registrar President

APPENDIX I

Application no.

Applicant ' s name

Birth-year

Present adress

Name of representative

846/07

Gülsüm Sayan

1982Aydın

Türkan Aslan , Izmir

8359/07

Eyüp Dağhan

1979Istanbul

Mükrime Avcı , Istanbul

31511/07

Serhat AvÅŸar

1977Istanbul

Gülizar Tuncer , Istanbul

44791/07

Minire Adaman

1962Mersin

Havva Karakaya , Mersin

61041/08

Saim Özkorkmaz

1971Istanbul

Leyla Albayrak , Istanbul

30662/09

Şükrü Sarıtaş

1954Izmir

Ömer Öneren , Ankara

39148/09

Gülay Saday

1972Adana

Mustafa Çinkılıç , Adana

APPENDIX II

No.

Application no. and name

Information for observations

1

846/07 Sayan

Aydın Assize Court - 30/6/2004

(E: 2002/268, K: 2004/269)

2

8359/07 DaÄŸhan

1) Bakırköy Assize Court – 6/11/2001

(E: 2000/322, K: 2001/427)

2) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 28/2/2002

(E: 2002/239, K: 2002/370)

3) Bakırköy Assize Court – 20/11/2002

(E: 2002/9, K: 2002/419)

4) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 14/1/2004

(E: 2003/1809, K: 2004/84)

5) Bakırköy Assize Court – 7/6/2004

(E: 2004/79, K: not submitted)

6)Court of Cassation (upheld) – 28/6/2006

(E: 2005/6889, K: 2006/3877)

3

31511/07 AvÅŸar

1) Bakırköy Assize Court – 5/5/2003

(E: 1999/427, K: 2003/96)

2) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 23/11/2004

(E: 2004/6579, K: 2004/6418)

3) Bakırköy Assize Court – 7/3/2007

(E: 2005/27, K: 2007/53)

4

44791/07 Adaman

1) Tarsus Assize Court – 9/12/2003

(E: 2003/226 – K: 2003/370)

2) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 16/7/2004 - not submitted

3) Tarsus Assize Court (lack of jurisdiction) - 7/6/2005

(E: 2005/37, K: 2005/132)

4) Mersin Assize Court (lack of jurisdiction) – 23/6/2005

(E: 2005/235, K: 2005/147)

5) Tarsus Assize Court – 30/3/2006

(E: 2006/41, K: 2006/95)

6) Court of Cassation (upheld) – 30/4/2007

(E: 2007/1192, K: 2007/3280)

5

61041/08 Özkorkmaz

1) Eyüp Assize Court – 15/6/2004

(E: 2003/240, K: 2004/392)

2) Court of Cassation (upheld) – 4/2/2008

(E: 2005/10183, K: 2008/917)

6

30662/09 Sarıtaş

1) Kocaeli Assize Court – 28/12/2001

(E: 1998/247, K: 2001/755)

2) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 17/9/2002

(E: 2002/1775, K: 2002/1778)

3) Kocaeli Assize Court – 2/3/2006

(E: 2002/269, K: 2006/40)

4) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 5/4/2007

(E: 2007/1548, K: 2007/2944)

5) Kocaeli Assize Court – 19/9/2007

(E: 207/167, K: 2007/286)

6) Court of Cassation (upheld) – 5/3/2009

(E: 2008/2064, K: 2009/2640)

7

39148/09 Saday

1) Adana Assize Court – 13/3/2002

(E: 1999/268, K: 2002/84)

2) Court of Cassation (quashed) – 24/2/2003

(E: 2003/69, K: 2003/68)

3) Adana Assize Court – 4/3/2004

(E: 2003/170, K: 2004/38)

4) Court of Cassation – not submitted

5) Adana Assize Court – 6/3/2009

(E: 2006/99, K: 2009/93)

[1] 1. See Appendix I

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255