Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 1981. Analog Devices GmbH v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte and Hauptzollamt München-West.
TWO CASES AGAINST ITALY (SEE APPENDIX) RELATING TO THE FAILURE TO ENFORCE JUDICIAL EVICTION ORDERS AGAINST TENANTS
POWERACT INDUSTRIES v. TURKEY
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 86/96 of 22 January 1996 determining the extent to which applications lodged in January 1996 for import licences for certain pigmeat products under the regime provided for by the Intermediate Agreements concluded by the Community with Bulgaria and Romania can be accepted
CASE OF CIMA v. ITALY
Council Regulation (EC) No 447/96 of 11 March 1996 laying down special measures for the import of olive oil from Tunisia
CASE OF MARIGLIANO v. ITALY
CASE OF SALI AGAINST SWEDEN
Commission Regulation (EC) No 165/2008 of 22 February 2008 concerning the authorisation of a new use of 3-phytase (Natuphos) as a feed additive (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF SHEMILOVA AND SHEMILOV v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF HAŢEGAN v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 24159/03 • ECHR ID: 001-110984

Document date: April 17, 2012

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

k unique documents citing • D citations total to m paragraphs

Outbound citations

h unique documents cited • h citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846