Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

FIRTH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 47784/09;47806/09;47812/09;47818/09;47829/09;49001/09;49007/09;49018/09;49033/09;49036/09 • ECHR ID: 001-144721

Document date: May 27, 2014

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 6

FIRTH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 47784/09;47806/09;47812/09;47818/09;47829/09;49001/09;49007/09;49018/09;49033/09;49036/09 • ECHR ID: 001-144721

Document date: May 27, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 47784/09 Paul FIRTH against the United Kingdom and 9 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 27 May 2014 as a Chamber composed of:

Ineta Ziemele, President, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, Paul Mahoney, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos , Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on various dates (for details see appendix),

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

1 . A list of the ten applicants is set out in the appendix. They are represented before the Court by Taylor & Kelly, a firm of solicitors based in Coatbridge.

A. The circumstances of the case

2 . The applicants complained that, as convicted prisoners, they were prevented from voting in the following: elections to the Scottish Parliament on 3 May 2007; elections to the European Parliament on 4 June 2009; and local government elections. They also noted in their application forms that “elections to the UK Parliament are forthcoming” and complained of the continuing refusal to allow them to exercise their right to vote.

B. Relevant domestic law and practice

3 . The relevant domestic law and practice is set out in the Court ’ s judgments in Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005 ‑ IX; and Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom , nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, ECHR 2010 (extracts); and its decision in McLean and Cole v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 12626/13 and 2522/12, 11 June 2013.

COMPLAINTS

4 . The applicants complained under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that they were subject to a blanket ban on voting in elections and had been prevented from voting in a number of elections (see paragraph 2 above).

5 . They also complained of a violation of Articles 6 and 13 on the grounds that they were refused legal aid to pursue domestic proceedings in respect of their complaints and that they had no effective remedy to address their complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 .

THE LAW

A. Joinder

6 . Given their similar factual and legal background, the Court decides that the applications should be joined pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court.

B. The complaint about the applicants ’ ineligibility to vote in the election on 4 June 2009

7 . In the light of its case-law, and in particular its judgments in Hirst (no. 2) , and Greens and M.T. , both cited above, the Court considers that it is necessary to give notice of this complaint to the respondent Government.

C. The remaining complaints

8 . The applicants also complained about elections in 2007; elections to local government bodies; and the continuing refusal to allow them to exercise their right to vote . They made reference to “forthcoming” parliamentary elections. They further complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention about their access to legal aid and the availability of effective remedies.

9 . Having regard to its findings in Greens and M.T. , cited above, §§ 90 ‑ 92, McLean and Cole , cited above, and Du nn and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 566/10 and 130 other applications, 13 May 2014, and in the light of all the material in its possession, the Court finds that these complaints do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.

10 . It follows that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to adjourn the examination of the applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 concerning their ineligibility to vote in the election of 4 June 2009;

Declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible.

Françoise Elens-Passos Ineta Ziemele Registrar President

Appe ndix

No.

Application no. and date of introduction

Applicant name,

(prisoner no.)

date of birth

place of residence

nationality

Address

Represented by

Election concerned

Detention details if known

47784/09

17/08/2009

Paul FIRTH

(80736)

12/09/1951

Peterhead

British

HMP Peterhead Peterhead

AB42 2YY

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU election 4 June 2009

Not known

47806/09

17/08/2009

Douglas NEILL

(4123)

06/08/1966

Kilmarnock

British

HMP Kilmarnock Mauchline Road Kilmarnock KA1 5AA

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Kilmarnock

47812/09

17/08/2009

Michael MC KENNA

(5802)

05/05/1970

Greenock

British

HMP Greenock Old Inverkip Road Greenock

PA16 9AH

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Greenock

47818/09

11/08/2009

Jamie BAIN

10/03/1984

Shotts

British

HMP Shotts Canthill Road Shotts

ML7 4LE

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Shotts

47829/09

17/08/2009

Stewart MC KECHNIE

(96580)

01/04/1979

Peterhead

British

HMP Peterhead Peterhead

AB42 2YY

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Peterhead

49001/09

28/08/2009

David MC CONACHIE

(11333)

30/06/1959

Dumfries

British

HMP Dumfries Terregles Street Dumfries

DG2 9AX

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Dumfries

49007/09

28/08/2009

Paul DILLON

(8295)

31/10/1971

Shotts

British

HMP Shotts Canthill Road Shotts

ML7 4LE

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Shotts

49018/09

28/08/2009

Robert DOW

(90526)

13/08/1973

Peterhead

British

HMP Peterhead Peterhead

AB42 2YY

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Peterhead

49033/09

28/08/2009

Raymond LEE

(55947)

13/10/1947

Peterhead

British

HMP Peterhead Peterhead

AB42 2YY

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Peterhead

49036/09

28/08/2009

Raymond LOVIE

(47784)

23/07/1974

Peterhead

British

HMP Peterhead UK – Peterhead

AB42 2YY

TAYLOR & KELLY

EU elections 4 June 2009

Detained at relevant time at HMP Peterhead

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255