Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF GOLUB v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF VALAITIS v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KRENC
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 19 July 2012. Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö v A Oy.
CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDSJOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES O ' DONOGHUE AND PEDERSEN
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 228/2012 of 15 March 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1721/97 of 3 September 1997 amending for the seventeenth time Regulation (EEC) No 3800/81 determining the classification of vine varieties
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2011. Maurits Casteels v British Airways plc.
BALMER-SCHAFROTH and NINE OTHERS v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. S. TRECHSEL
Judgment of the Court of 6 May 2003. Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau.

Document text Analytics

TRADE UNION IN THE FACTORY "4TH NOVEMBER" v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

Doc ref: 15557/10 • ECHR ID: 001-157772

Document date: September 8, 2015

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 8

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

l unique documents citing • F citations total to x paragraphs

Outbound citations

k unique documents cited • q citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846