Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ŞIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 490/83 of 1 March 1983 correcting Regulation (EEC) No 449/83 with regard to the components used to calculate the differential amounts for colza, rape and sunflower seed
CASE OF BALOGH v. HUNGARYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BAKA JOINED BY JUDGES JUNGWIERT AND BUTKEVYCH
Council Regulation (EC) No 57/2004 of 27 October 2003 amending Commission Decision 2002/602/ECSC on administering certain restrictions on imports of certain steel products from the Russian Federation
Commission Regulation (EC) No 432/2007 of 20 April 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF ERMÉNYI v. HUNGARYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE K Ū RIS
CASE OF COORPLAN-JENNI GMBH AND HASCIC v. AUSTRIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE STEINER JOINED BY JUDGE VAJIĆ

Document text Analytics

N. AND M. v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 39496/14;39727/14 • ECHR ID: 001-163317

Document date: April 26, 2016

Inbound citations: 9
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

C unique documents citing • 1 citations total to c paragraphs

Outbound citations

7 unique documents cited • y citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846