Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDSDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON
CASE OF VAQUERO HERNANDEZ AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
CASE OF FINDLAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 983/2008 of 3 October 2008 adopting the plan allocating to the Member States resources to be charged to the 2009 budget year for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community
CASE OF IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DICULESCU-ÅžOVA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2308/98 of 26 October 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 658/96 on certain conditions for granting compensatory payments under the support system for producers of certain arable crops
CASE OF GERASIMOVA v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
CASE OF DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE GROZEV
CASE OF MAURICE v. FRANCESEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BONELLO
CASE OF REMLI v. FRANCEDISSE NTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM

Doc ref: 11613/85 • ECHR ID: 001-57742

Document date: September 24, 1992

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

5 unique documents citing • W citations total to l paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846