Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH AND KRAWAGNA-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE JEBENS
CASE OF KONUK AND OTHERS AGAINST TURKEY AND 8 OTHER CASES
CASE OF S.J. v. BELGIUMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE POWER-FORDE
M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF A.B. AGAINST THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 514/2011 of 25 May 2011 laying down the detailed rules for implementing the preferential trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products, as provided for in Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009
CASE OF PRAMSTALLER v. AUSTRIASEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
CASE OF SATIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TÃœRMEN
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINTO DE ALBUQUERQUE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KAWKA v. POLAND

Doc ref: 25874/94 • ECHR ID: 001-59112

Document date: January 9, 2001

Inbound citations: 18
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Jk unique documents citing • Ix citations total to v paragraphs

Outbound citations

t unique documents cited • J citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846