Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF FÜRST-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WOJTYCZEK AND KŪRIS
CASE OF ANDRUSENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF KINGSLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL JOINED BY JUDGES BONELLO AND KOVLER
CASE OF BOYCHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Council Regulation (EC) No 1362/2002 of 22 July 2002 establishing concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural products and providing for an adjustment, as an autonomous and transitional measure, of certain agricultural concessions provided for in the Europe Agreement with Latvia
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 295/97 of 19 February 1997 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
PRIYA v. DENMARK
CASE OF KORRE v. GREECE
CASE OF CODARCEA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ODABASI AND KOCAK AGAINST TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF AL-NASHIF v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 50963/99 • ECHR ID: 001-60522

Document date: June 20, 2002

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 20

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

LJ unique documents cited • nG citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846