Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KOSAITĖ - ČYPIENĖ AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LAFFRANQUE
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber), 5 December 2013. Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 March 2011. Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 102/92 of 16 January 1992 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIASEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 125/98 of 16 January 1998 fixing the export refunds on beef and veal
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2018. Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited.
CASE OF TANER KILIÇ v. TURKEY (No. 2) - [Turkish Translation] by Amnesty International
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1516/98 of 15 July 1998 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat
Commission Decision (EU) 2019/56 of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/c) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 StromNEV (notified under document C(2018) 3166) (Text with EEA relevance.)

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 February 2006. A-Punkt Schmuckhandels GmbH v Claudia Schmidt.

C-441/04 • 62004CJ0441 • ECLI:EU:C:2006:141

Inbound citations: 10
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 26

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

cm unique documents citing • nW citations total to e paragraphs

Outbound citations

1g unique documents cited • 19 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846