Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
CASE OF TALPIS v. ITALYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SPANO
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 January 2023. Frédéric Jouvin v European Commission.
CASE OF GJINI v. SERBIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES PASTOR VILANOVA AND SERGHIDES
I.B. v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2017. Intel Corp. v European Commission.
CASE OF PERNA v. ITALYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CONFORTI, JOINED BY JUDGE LEVITS
Commission Directive 97/35/EC of 18 June 1997 adapting to technical progress for the second time Council Directive 90/220/EEC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (Text with EEA relevance)
Christian Religious Organization of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Armenia (dec.)
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLICDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JUNGWIERT

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 October 2011.

Aragonesas Industrias y Energía, SAU v European Commission.

T-348/08 • 62008TJ0348 • ECLI:EU:T:2011:621

Inbound citations: 21
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 89

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

UI unique documents citing • Yz citations total to B paragraphs

Outbound citations

AV unique documents cited • Id citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846