Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MUHAMMAD AND MUHAMMAD v. ROMANIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES YUDKIVSKA, MOTOC AND PACZOLAY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1077/2008 of 3 November 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1566/2007
CASE OF HENTRICH v. FRANCE (INTERPRETATION)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Regulation (EEC) No 1388/70 of the Council of 13 July 1970 on general rules for the classification of vine varieties
CASE OF MAJKRZYK v. POLAND
CASE OF SALIH KAPLAN v. TURKEY (No. 2)
CASE OF KRISZTIÁN BARNABÁS TÓTH v. HUNGARY
CASE OF KARABAS v. TURKEY
CASE OF BITTÓ AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOTOC
CASE OF MIHAI TOMA AGAINST ROMANIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MALAHOV v. MOLDOVA

Doc ref: 32268/02 • ECHR ID: 001-80914

Document date: June 7, 2007

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 5

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

O unique documents cited • d citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846