Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ÇINAR AND 21 OTHER CASES AGAINST TURKEY
CASE OF ORPHANIDES v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž
CASE OF ANDREI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIAJOINT PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S BOTOUCHAROVA AND MARUSTE
Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 of 12 March 2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF HELDENBURG v. THE CZECH REPUBLICPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOSKELO
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 362/2009 of 4 May 2009 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 945/2008 for the 2008/2009 marketing year
Commission Regulation (EC) No 19/2003 of 6 January 2003 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
CASE OF SILVA PONTES v. PORTUGALDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
CASE OF KASAP AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF HADRI-VIONNET v. SWITZERLAND

Doc ref: 55525/00 • ECHR ID: 001-85078

Document date: February 14, 2008

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 13

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

6w unique documents cited • SZ citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846