Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SHMUSHKOVYCH v. UKRAINE
CASE OF PCHELINTSEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
Commission Regulation (EC) No 280/1999 of 5 February 1999 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled medium round grain and long grain a rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2565/98
Commission Regulation (EC) No 9/2001 of 4 January 2001 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
Council Regulation (EC) No 2677/2000 of 4 December 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 1349/2000 establishing certain concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural products and providing for an adjustment, as an autonomous and transitional measure, of certain agricultural concessions provided for in the Europe Agreement with Estonia
ABDULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GYULUMYAN
CASE OF VAJNAI AGAINST HUNGARY AND 5 OTHER CASES
CASE OF KIŞLAKÇI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF EMİROĞLU AGAINST TURKEY AND 2 OTHER CASES

Document text Analytics

CASE OF SALATKHANOVY v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 17945/03 • ECHR ID: 001-88930

Document date: October 16, 2008

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 9

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

1 unique documents citing • M citations total to e paragraphs

Outbound citations

m unique documents cited • u citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707