Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DIZMAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MULARONI
CASE OF MILE NOVAKOVIĆ v. CROATIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GRABOWSKI AGAISNT POLAND
CASE OF ALALOĞLU AND OTHERS AGAINST TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1664/87 of 15 June 1987 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1183/86 and (EEC) No 1184/86 laying down detailed rules for the system for controlling certain products in the oils and fats sector in Spain and Portugal respectively
CASE OF BEVACQUA AND S. v. BULGARIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 676/2009 of 27 July 2009 opening an invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on maize imported into Spain from third countries
CASE OF VERENIGING WEEKBLAD BLUF! v. THE NETHERLANDS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF LYUBIMENKO v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 6270/06 • ECHR ID: 001-91790

Document date: March 19, 2009

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 33

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

hz unique documents cited • WH citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846