Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ŞAHİN ALPAY v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ERGÃœL
Commission Regulation (EC) No 475/2005 of 23 March 2005 concerning the 79th special invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999
Commission Regulation (EC) No 131/2003 of 24 January 2003 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled long grain B rice to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2002
CASE OF GREMINA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A AND B v. GEORGIA
CASE OF FURCHT AGAINST GERMANY
CASE OF STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JEBENS, JOINED BY JUDGE SPIELMANN
CASE OF M.D. AND A.D. v. FRANCE
CASE OF SAVCA AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE PASTOR VILANOVA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MIKOLENKO v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 10664/05 • ECHR ID: 001-94863

Document date: October 8, 2009

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

2 unique documents cited • N citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846