Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF HÅKANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
Commission Regulation (EU) No 949/2010 of 21 October 2010 fixing the export refunds on pigmeat
BERGER AND HÜTTALER v. AUSTRIA
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 30/97 of 9 January 1997 on the issue of import licences for garlic originating in China
Commission Regulation (EC) No 37/2006 of 11 January 2006 on granting of import licences for cane sugar for the purposes of certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements
X. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1150/95 of 22 May 1995 amending Regulation (EC) No 738/94 laying down certain rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 520/94 establishing a Community procedure for administering quantitative quotas
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 51/85 of 9 January 1985 fixing the amounts to be levied in the beef sector on products which left the United Kingdom during the week 3 to 9 December 1984
Commission regulation (EC) No 1964/2006 of 22 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the opening and administration of an import quota for rice originating in Bangladesh, pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90
CASE OF GAUCI AND OTHERS v. MALTA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FEDCHENKO v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 33333/04 • ECHR ID: 001-97224

Document date: February 11, 2010

Inbound citations: 14
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 9

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

6K unique documents citing • oQ citations total to 5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

J unique documents cited • r citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846