Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SVYATO-MYKHAYLIVSKA PARAFIYA AGAINST UKRAINE
Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 of 8 November 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People’s Republic of China, India, South Africa and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2009. Moser Baer India Ltd v Council of the European Union.
STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AGAINST BULGARIA
H. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Council Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 of 12 August 1999 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty, and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed, on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China, Hungary, India, Mexico, Poland, South Africa and Ukraine and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of imports originating in the Republic of Korea
CASE OF CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 412/03;35677/04 • ECHR ID: 001-100433

Document date: September 16, 2010

Inbound citations: 55
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 23

Separate Opinions

Browse separate opinions available for this document.

CASE OF HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KALAYDJIEVA

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846